I’m not okay

The obnoxious blaring of my alarm abruptly drags me out of sleep. As I slowly wade through the morning grogginess I already feel despair begin to emanate from my heart and out to my faculties. I lie there, prone, dreading the day ahead. Sigh…how am I going to get through today this time?

I’m depressed, no – I have depression. There. I said it.

Living with this…disease is a daily struggle.

Outwardly I project an image of strength and capability, but it’s just a mask papering over the cracks, disguising the broken messy chaos inside.

Sometimes I’m okay, even excited about life’s possibilities. I have phases where I want to squeeze out all the amazing experiences available in this world, to ring the towel dry. Then I have chapters where I feel utterly defeated, crippled by a suffocating shroud of melancholy. This is the head space I’ve been operating in this past month.

Grey emotions have dogged me relentlessly. Sadness. Grief. Confusion. Frustration. Anger. Helplessness. Regret. Anxiety. Fear. Worthlessness. One giant bitter cocktail of crushing feelings.

It is a dog too, depression. That old analogy of the black dog rings true, a dark four-legged omen that paints my world in black.

I thought with time it would get sick of tormenting me and attach itself to some other unwilling owner. I thought it was just sniffing around my ankles because my brother, himself a victim of psychosis, killed himself. Then the mother of my children left me for women and the dog grew darker and nastier and growls at me whenever I tell it to ‘shoo!’ It feels like it’s here to stay.

It’s not just mental. The interplay between mental health and physical health is intrinsic and my ‘mental’ depression also manifests in very physical trauma. I become less likely to do the things I know I need to do to manage my depression. All the good habits I’ve developed in the wake of my split disappear and I have to start scaling the oppressively tall mountain all over again, and again, and again…

I’ve been up and down like a yo-yo since my ex-partner left me. The black dog was keeping me company before that, since my brother suicided really, and there’s been stressful jobs and the pressures of parenthood as well. But the split was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Like a pro boxer who’s taken too many hits to the head and then suffers a devastating knockout. I lost a home, a partner, and a family unit all at a time when I needed stability. The ground opened up beneath me and I’ve been falling ever since. Sometimes I can break the fall and I begin to climb out of the bottomless hole, only to lose my grip and renew my plummet.

I’m good at hiding it. Somehow I function and I make people believe I’m this happy, contented person. I do a piss poor job of talking about it though. It’s not that I don’t want to necessarily, it just…it’s painful to say the words, and I’m so very cynical about people and their capacity to listen. People don’t know what to say and even those who are sympathetic often aren’t proactive. I’m suffering and yet I still have to make the effort to reach out and make myself vulnerable!? People ask “how are you?” and it’s just a cursory effort to make pleasantries or talk about themselves. Unfair? Maybe. You see – cynical.

Sometimes (rarely) I’m brave enough to respond with “I’m not doing so great” and my confidants respond with “what’s wrong?”

I have no idea.

Logically I can point to little inciting incidents like reading about Greg Boyed’s death and being reminded of my brother’s suicide, or being sad because my daughter is starting primary school and her parents can’t share this pivotal moment together because they’ve split up. But really I’ve got no idea. I can’t just be those things because it’s been ages and the lights are still flickering – I still spend too much time in the dark.

I don’t want to be depressed. People who suffer from depression desperately want to be happy. It’s not a choice. You can’t simply choose to change your state of mind to allow more positive thoughts. Like driving in the fog on a winding road you’ve never driven before, depression is really hard to navigate.

So I just put one foot in front of the other and keep plodding on. I try to develop good habits. I’m pretty good at maintaining my fitness and physical exercise has been the best therapy for depression – I don’t know if I would have survived the past 9 months without it. I’m going on an adventurous holiday to Nepal in a few weeks. I meditate semi-frequently. I’m trying.

Writing all this down is very indulgent. I’m not sure what I’m trying to achieve – what sort of positive impact it’s going to make, if any. I guess it’s “a day in the life of someone with depression”?

Maybe I just want to let my friends and family know that I’m not okay. But I’m trying to be.

Job ads or booby traps?

Fresh from graduation, you begin the tedious process of job-seeking. During one of your daily visits to Seek, Trademe and Student Job Search you find an interesting ad on the latter website. A promotions agency is offering a fixed-term position, with a minimum 10 hours per week, and paying $19 per hour. Why not? You think, it’s a living wage and the modest hours would be great with the summer coming up.

When you find an email in your inbox inviting you for a job interview you can’t help but fist pump, after all jobs aren’t easy to come by in today’s workforce. But this is where things go sour. After spending thirty minutes with the suit in charge of recruitment it becomes abundantly clear that the job ad was dripping with honeyed promises and the reality of what was on offer is vastly different: rather than a fixed-term employee role with a minimum ten hours it is actually an independent contractor role with no guaranteed hours, and the pay? It could fluctuate anywhere between minimum wage and the ‘promised’ $19 depending on client activity.

You feel mislead, duped – and I don’t blame you. This is a true story by the way, and a scenario that is sadly not uncommon. It happened to a young woman during October and she came to the YWRC expressing frustration at both the employer’s potential dishonesty and the seeming lack of avenues to hold them accountable.

I’ve been in a similar situation myself. Once upon a time I was considering crossing over to what journalists refer to as ‘the dark side’ of the media industry – public relations (one could describe it as trading their journalistic soul for a higher pay packet…) I saw a job advertisement online for a PR role at a firm and decided to go for it. Cue my fancy shirt, a tie, daunting job interview, a celebratory beer, and a second interview, all before being told at the last hurdle that actually, the role wouldn’t have anything to do with public relations work until I had ‘proven’ myself evangelising people in their own homes about the beauty of a new tele-communications company. If I’d have known the job would consist of door knocking I never would have applied.

So what can you do if you feel an employer has misled you with a fallacious job advert? You could chalk it up to life experience and move on, but it’s not really fair that you have wasted time with this wolf in sheep’s clothing when you could have been engaging with more meaningful, and honest, opportunities. And from a community watchdog’s point of view I would encourage anyone who finds themselves in a similar situation to lodge a complaint if the employer shows no sign of being reasonable. If you don’t what’s to stop it happening to others?

Furthermore, it’s actually against the law to hoodwink job seekers by promising the moon without following through. The Fair Trading Act prohibits employers from deceiving people when it comes to an offer of employment – even if it was never their intention to do so. This means the job advertisement must be a fair representation of the nature of the role and the conditions on offer.

If you were going to complain the Commerce Commission would be a good first bet, followed by the Advertising Standards Authority. The Commerce Commission is responsible for enforcing the Fair Trading Act and can pursue legal action against employers and companies breaching the rules, with a potential fine of up $600,000. For less serious breaches the commission would usually give an employer a slap-on-the-wrist in the form of a compliance letter. A letter from either of these authorities will make the employer think twice about listing misleading advertisements in the future, and may stop other job seekers from being exploited. If you saw the ad on a website like Seek or Student Job Search it’s a good idea to let them know as well, they usually won’t be too thrilled to hear of employers misusing their service and might have a word to the culprit.

Let’s look at this from another angle. Maybe you are annoyed that the conditions on offer resemble nothing like those advertised but you’re still tempted to take the job because it’s a competitive market out there.

Labour Studies graduate Melissa Goodman has felt the temptation herself but warns young people not to be rash when job hunting.

“As a job seeker you may be more willing to say yes to a mediocre job offer, for fear of saying no and continuing to look, potentially unsuccessfully. Even though this may be the reality for many people, I would advise them to scrutinise what it is that is being sold, the language of deception, and how truly what is being proposed compares to the contractual arrangements.”

Many of these dodgy ads are going unchallenged simply because people will accept a job because they are either desperate for work, or are unable to cut through the rhetoric or fancy sales pitch. Once you’ve signed a contract, you have very little ability to change your working conditions so it’s pays to take precautions. If you find a job offer suspect, get advice – get in touch with the Young Workers Resource Centre, 0800 AT YWRC or ywrc@xtra.co.nz.

Employment buzzwords/phrases to look out for:

Flexibility: just whose flexibility are we talking about here? Yours? The employer’s? Or both? Flexibility for the employer can often result in uncertainty for the employee. Make sure you clarify exactly what this means if you see it pop up in your proposed contract.

Hours of work: some contracts can be cagey around what the expected hours are, especially now that casual contracts are becoming so common. E.g. If the employer suggests the role is full-time but the contract says you’re entitled to a maximum of 40 hours that does not guarantee you full-time work. Clear up the expectations and iron out the kinks before signing on the dotted line.

Casual: if you are employed on a casual basis you are guaranteed no hours at all, so be prepared for this. However an employer can’t hire you as a casual but expect you to work full-time or regular hours. If they expect the latter then they need to hire you as permanent staff.

Incentive based/KPIs: Essentially translates to performance pay, you’ll get paid if you nail the key performance indicators E.g. the job ad promises $20 p/h but in reality you will receive $14.25 and may get up to $20 if you meet performance objectives.

Independent contractor: basically means you are self-employed. That may sound nice but it means you are responsible for fulfilling all your tax obligations, are not entitled to leave, and have far less job security than an employee.

Where’s my rights?

You should actually care about this.

It’s not your fault if you haven’t got a clue. The average joe usually doesn’t hear about changes to their rights until the laws have already been passed. Let me help:

In the next 100 days workers will be facing a big upheaval of our rights – and many of us won’t even notice until it’s staring us in the face. Our right to a break, likelihood of a pay rise, and the muscle our unions have are all under the microscope.

So there’s this little thing called the Employment Relations Act that means bosses, workers and unions have to make nice with each other. It entitles workers to cool things like breaks, justice for bad treatment, a decent contract, and a union to give a toss about us.

The government reckons that at the moment employees and unions have too much power, they want to take away a bit of that power and give it to employers. They argue that employers require more flexibility to steer the ship the way they want so they’ve put together a package called the Employment Relations Amendment Act to do just that.

Now I’d be fine with it if all employers were on the side of the angels, but sadly many are not. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of fair and reasonable bosses out there with a conscience that extends beyond their profit margins, but there are also ample employers out there who would pay you less if they could.

The easiest change to explain is the axing of our tea break. This is not the scariest change in the parcel but it is the most likely to piss the average worker off. At the moment a 10-minute paid break is a minimum right that we have for every four hours worked. It’s a sensible entitlement, one that allows workers to refresh and refocus, meaning they will be more motivated and perform their job safer and more productively.

I won’t say enjoy it while you can but I will say that a morning tea break will no longer be a concrete entitlement. Employers will be able to, if they have reasonable cause, dictate when and where breaks are taken and have the power to withhold smoko breaks altogether.

Now I know from experience that in some industries there already exists a culture of peer-pressure not to take breaks (cough* hospitality *cough). My concern is that the law change will legitimize this custom and that we will see the same thing creep into other industries and workplaces.

The most harmful part of the deal however is the changes to collective bargaining – when unions and employers negotiate with each other to develop an employment agreement for workers. Currently the law says that if these two parties begin negotiating they have a good faith obligation to come to an arrangement, i.e. finish the negotiation by reaching a deal. Sounds pretty reasonable no? If my girlfriend asks me to wash the dishes and I say “later” but she isn’t happy with that response, we’ve got to come to a compromise right?

Well the new law says if employers get fed up with talking they can take a hike and essentially ditch the negotiation, effectively leaving the union, and the workers, in no man’s land. This could have a number of consequences:

  • Unions will have less influence to negotiate fair contracts for workers.
  • Bargaining could take forever – leaving workers in the lurch.
  • Employers could stall long enough for the bargaining period to finish and then offer their workers individual contracts with worse conditions.
  • Overall union influence and membership could diminish.

The last point is bad news for all workers, even those who aren’t union members, because unions are the only real voice in support of us and our working rights not only in terms of defending employees but also in terms of having an influence on laws that could affect your rights (oh the irony). Less union members means unions have less capacity to have a say in what goes on in the Beehive.

The Human Rights Commish, itself an independent arm of the government, told the PM that the new law is a bad idea and could breach the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

In a report to the government the commish said: “it is difficult to understand the justification for deregulating the New Zealand labour market even further, while at the same time breaching international obligations to protect employee’s rights.”

But so far our Human Rights representatives have been treated like the unwanted uncle who lives alone in a hut in the bush and talks to possums – soundly ignored.

There’s more. The current 30 day rule that means new workers are covered by the conditions of an existing collective employment agreement will be canned. This 30-day grace period gives workers time to choose whether to join a union and continue to enjoy the benefits of the collective or sign an individual employment agreement instead. Removing this means employers can lock workers into individual contracts before workers get to taste the fruits of union membership.

Strikes will be cracked down on and employers will be able to reduce the pay of striking workers and it will be made more difficult for unions to access worksites and encourage workers to join.

If I was a sceptical man I would suspect that these law changes are aimed at reducing union membership and as a result, lessen the influence unions have on government policy.

Our unions have campaigned for decades to ensure that we have decent working conditions. Without them keeping tabs on government we wouldn’t have a minimum wage, maternity leave, reasonable working hours, and holidays. True story.

Just to drive the point home further – after 16 deaths in the forestry industry in 2012-2013, Worksafe, the government’s health and safety watchdog, has reported 1 death in 2014. This is largely due to the unions exposing the horrendous working conditions in the industry and forcing the issue onto the government agenda. Without unions more Kiwi families would be mourning fathers, sons, and brothers.

Now I am a worker whose job it is to look out for other workers, so clearly I am biased, but this Employment Relations Amendment Act – it stinks.

045-0528043256-union-busting-shoe1

Is Democracy Dying?

That was an anti-climax.

I gave them free sausages, plastered the tertiary centres with awesome posters (credit to Tim Ingle), waged a social media campaign to raise awareness, and even dressed up in an orange morph-suit for their amusement (my alter-ego as the mighty Electoral Man).

But they still didn’t vote.

I’m talking about young New Zealanders, who for a range of reasons didn’t make the trip to the polling booths in the recent general election.

Again, we activists who are so passionate about democracy haven’t been able to unearth the ‘missing million’ – that’s how many didn’t vote in 2011 and it was roughly the same outcome this election.

Twenty nine per cent of enrolled voters found something better to do and nine per cent of eligible voters didn’t enrol. Non-voters outnumbered the combined votes of the National Party, Act, United Future, Maori Party, Conservative Party, Internet-Mana and the Legalize Marijuana Party.

I have reason to believe that a massive chunk of these non-voters were young people, considering that in 2011 a quarter of the missing million were aged between 18-25.

So what the hell happened?

We can point the finger at Dirty Politics, Kim Dotcom, John Key’s spin doctors, and corrupt media coverage until we are blue in the face, but the lack of engagement in our democracy goes far deeper than these election phenomena (actually Key’s super spinners have been around for ages, same goes for corrupt media and probably dirty politics too).

I think young people just don’t give a shit about politics. And why should they? They don’t learn about it school and if they DO have political views they are normally hand-me downs from their parents – that is assuming their parents are politically literate themselves.

Mention politics to a young person and I bet the first thing that pops in their head is an image of two old dinosaurs in suits bickering about inflation or some other economical concept they have no understanding of. How are they supposed to relate to that?

Back to education – what is going to be more impactful on a young person’s life? Algebra and geometry or civics education? Shakespeare or the study of New Zealand democracy?

I’ve got nothing against Macbeth and quantum physicists but I do think some of our education priorities are a bit archaic. I’m not suggesting that maths shouldn’t be a core subject – I’m saying that without meaningful education around civic engagement, young people have no idea how to participate in our democracy.

If we want to maintain a responsible and functioning democracy where everyone is equipped to contribute then it’s on us to make sure future generations are encouraged to participate. This has to start in our schools.

But then there is still the issue of those young people who do have a clue about politics but don’t vote because they think the system is broken – an argument I find hard to disagree with.

When New Zealand elects a government draped in corruption, negative campaigning decides the outcome, big money buys votes, and a million people who could vote don’t – then our democracy is in critical condition.

Maybe I’m being naive, maybe this has been going on forever – but does that mean we should accept it, throw our hands up in the air and say “we’ll all politicians are bent anyway”? This is exactly why we are haemorrhaging democratic engagement among the youth.

Is there a better system out there? I don’t know. But for now we have this one and if we want it to represent all Kiwis, if that is a goal those on the left, right or smack in the middle aspire to, then it behoves us to ensure young Kiwis are given the best possible foundation to make good decisions – or in fact make a decision full stop.

General Election 2014 voter turnout.

General Election 2014 voter turnout.

How Do You Choose Who to Vote For?

When I was but a short-arse who only cared about making forts out of sheets and couch cushions my parents were busy campaigning for the Alliance Party.

I was about 7 when my dad stood as an Alliance candidate in the Wairarapa electorate. I was the old man’s security guard, mascot and director of leafleting. I would accompany him on the campaign trail throughout his regional pilgrimage – he’d even let me have a turn on the megaphone sometimes.

I took exception though when it came to folding flyers – the most monotonous task ever.

My mother was a staunch unionist who fought tooth and nail for the right to work and stood up for the disenfranchised when nobody else would. When she was 23 she spoke at the 1984 Economic Summit in front of basically the most ‘important’ people in New Zealand about how shit unemployment was.

My parents instilled in me a sense of social conscience at a very early age – lift people up, help the underdog, equal opportunities, fair society, gainful employment – these were the values that have seeped into me as I have grown to adulthood.

I carried these values with me to the polling booth yesterday. Two ticks for a fair society.

I’ve always known what direction to cast my vote but for others it’s not so clear-cut. Our parents are probably the biggest political influence we have but what if they are not politically literate? Where then can we find the inspiration to form our political beliefs?

School education is sorely lacking. There is no formal education about civics, voting, democracy bar a wee slice in junior social studies. This should form an integral part of the curriculum – if we are not literate in our political system how are we going to make informed choices? Worse yet, are we even going to bother to vote?

To change direction, voting isn’t simply about selecting a party who has impressed you the most over a few months of gluttonous (and biased) media coverage. To get all fancy, it’s about ideology and political philosophy. We have to ask ourselves: Where on the political spectrum do we align our values?

There are various ways to look at it but the easiest way to spell it out is left and right. The question I ask people is: do you want an Aotearoa where we look after ourselves and each other? Or a New Zealand where we care only for what affects us personally.

I’m going to sound really harsh here but sadly too many Kiwis think selfishly. Don’t get too upset – it is a human trait after all, self-preservation and all that. We can accept that this is a human trait and stick to the status quo or we can choose to believe that there is always a better way, and the only way we will get there is by looking out for each other. No one ever improved anything by thinking about themselves.

Don’t be swayed by the mainstream media, by political spin doctors and flowery words – think with your brain but also your heart.

We’ll get there – together.

“The needs of the many outweigh those of the few, or the one” – Spock.

25 Reasons Young People Should Vote

I can think of about fifty reasons off the top of my head but half of them would expose my political leanings and that would be naughty. Although if your good at reading between the lines you will discover them by the end of this article anyway.

That leaves another twenty five supposedly unbiased reasons to commandeer the polling booth for roughly 186 seconds of your life. So without further adieu:

Reason number #1: It’s physically easy to do. You could either a) spend an extra five minutes scrolling your Facebook newsfeed and reading about how your mate Candice got trapped on an escalator when the power went out… or b) go to the nearest early polling booth.

Reason #2: Voting doesn’t have to be a chore. Why not do what young people do best and turn it into a party? Give it a festive vibe, organise a short hikoi to the polls, snort a shot of tequila every time Kim Dotcom is compared to an emperor penguin in a turtleneck sweater, lose an item of clothing whenever Jacinda Adern appears on TV coverage – and let Nexus publish the embarrassing photos.

Reason #3: There are certain groups who don’t want you to vote. There are those who either fear the power of your favourite blue bic pen that has been gnawed half to death from hours of monotonous uni lectures, and/or don’t think the student voice is worth a damn.

If you’ve been following the Dirty Politics scandal you’ll know that subliminally encouraging non-voting is a strategy used by some pollies – poor form if you ask me.

This attitude is shared by the electoral commission, who only acquiesced to having a booth on the Waikato Uni campus after being lobbied relentlessly by the Tertiary Education Union and other individuals who want to preserve your democratic rights. Good on them for finally seeing sense though.

Reason #4: Voting is your right and don’t let anyone suggest it won’t make a difference. Guess what? Your vote carries just as much influence as John Key’s, Richie McCaw’s, and even…Guy Williams’.

Reason #5: This one is a fact. One million eligible voters didn’t turn out at the last election. Would that many votes make a difference?

Reason #6: We are a generation that for the most part cares about Climate Change. Some pollies are making noises about it, others are claiming the science is a bunch of “mumbo jumbo” – you be the judge, jury, and if necessary, executioner (figuratively speaking).

Reason #7: If all the eligible voters under the age of 35 voted in this election we would control who ends up running the show.

Reason #8: Would you like the power to vote for a new boss? Especially after that time he blamed you for serving fries to a gluten-intolerant customer who ordered vege chips when you didn’t even take the order? Sure you would. Unfortunately we can’t vote for who our employer is but we can vote for who is elected the boss of New Zealand.

Reason #9: The decisions made by the current government, and the new government come September 20, will affect us far more than our parents. We will have to live with the consequences of said decisions longer than anyone else. If you don’t vote you’re basically agreeing to let your folks decide what’s best for you…again – so put your huggies on because you’re a big kid now.

Reason #10: The average age of an MP is 52. Meaning that lot in power spent nearly 40 years without the internet. I know…there once was a time when we couldn’t ask Uncle Google if rhinos were just obese unicorns, crazy huh? So 52…does that sound representative to you? There are plenty of good young(ish) candidates running so why not consider them instead of the Grey Power conglomerate.

Reason #11: The cost of education now is just astronomical and it annoys the fire-truck out of me because my folks got to ‘study’ for free and smoke doobie snacks in between lectures. The same folk who received their education for free are now charging us out the arse for ours. So I’d encourage you to probe politicians about their policies concerning tertiary study.

Reason #12: Kiwi ladies were the first to win the right to vote in Western society way back in 1893. Our history is full of awesome little firsts like that so let’s honour that legacy of getting shit done and get out and vote. FYI Women’s Suffrage Day, a celebration of this achievement, is September 19 which just so happens to be the day before the election.

Reason #13: Because there will be a decision made by the/a government that is going to ruffle your feathers. We all care about something whether it’s mining in National Parks, reducing national debt, or free medical for kids. For me its fair rights for workers – that 90 day trial period just grinds my gears.

Reason #14: We need jobs. There are bugger-all available and often we’re fighting each other to get one. Gone are the days when a uni degree basically guaranteed you employment.

Reason #15: If you vote and an ‘older’ person you know doesn’t then you can give them shit forever. Like my uncle Mike who tends to stay at home and collect pet doves…

Reason #16: “I’m not voting because you are terrified Colin Craig won’t get elected and you just can’t bear the thought of Parliament being deprived of his chiselled good looks” – someone actually said this to me. Take this guy’s vote – he obviously wasn’t going to employ it usefully anyway.

Reason #17: New Zealand currently has the second worst paid parental leave entitlements in the OECD. The worst? America, where there is no paid entitlement. Look up 26 for babies.

Reason #18: I’m not a stoner but a cheeky smoke behind C block isn’t going to hurt anyone. The criminalization of cannabis consumption is a daft and prehistoric policy better left to the annals of history – your vote can contribute to change, and munchies.

Reason #19: Vote for New Zealand. Shit we live here so we might as well at least try to make it as sweet as we possibly can right?

Reason #20: You can vote now. Early voting opened on September 3 and there are booths everywhere. It’s never been easier.

Reason #20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25: Okay my editor will get grumpy if I breach the word count on this piece (a word count I am currently wasting by telling you about how I shouldn’t be wasting it) so I’m going to crowbar the final five reasons into a spectacularly lame haiku:

Poor kids and land bids,

Alarming free trade and bent spies,

Too much buffering.

If you want to know my other ‘politically-charged’ 25 reasons to vote then email me tony@ywrc.org.nz.